Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Luke Bambridge vs Dennis Nevolo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bambridge vs Nevolo analysis and find out who is favored!
Luke Bambridge vs Dennis Nevolo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bambridge 1 - 2 Nevolo
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bambridge has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nevolo has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bambridge, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nevolo has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bambridge has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nevolo has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bambridge has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Nevolo winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bambridge has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 32/ 25), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 9/ 16). Nevolo has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 46/ 31), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 25/ 28).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Bambridge winning 1 times and Nevolo being victorious 2 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Bambridge winning 2 and Nevolo winning 4. The last match between Bambridge and Nevolo was at the USA F39, 01-12-2016, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Luke Bambridge getting the victory 6-3 2-1 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:42:53.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bambridge and Nevolo have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bambridge winning 0 times and Nevolo 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bambridge winning 0, and Nevolo 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bambridge has played against opponents with an average rank of while Nevolo has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bambridge has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nevolo has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bambridge has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nevolo has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
481
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total2
0
Hard1
0
Clay1
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
345
High
34
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
52% (176-161)
Career Total W/L
57% (198-151)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$4,650
Career Prize Money
$500
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Luke Bambridge vs Dennis Nevolo For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Bambridge VS Nevolo
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Luke Bambridge | Dennis Nevolo |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 4 |
| Games Won | 20 | 28 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:42:53 | 0:42:53 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (53/103) | 60% (56/93) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (39/53) | 70% (39/56) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (24/50) | 59% (22/37) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (3/9) | 50% (4/8) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (32/93) | 39% (40/103) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 2-1 ret. |
Stats 
Luke Bambridge
Player
Dennis Nevolo
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
54
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Dennis Nevolo
Player
Luke Bambridge
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
46%
(
29 of
63)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Luke Bambridge | Dennis Nevolo |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Luke Bambridge Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Luke Bambridge
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
11
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Luke Bambridge
47%
(
47 of
99)
1st Serve %
48%
(
50 of
104)
14
Aces
11
13
Double Faults
6
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
46%
(
24 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Luke Bambridge
71%
(
80 of
113)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
121)
22
Aces
27
5
Double Faults
5
78%
(
62 of
80)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
59 of
74)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
33 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
42 of
121)
122
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luke Bambridge
Player
Mateusz Terczynski
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Luke Bambridge
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
20 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Escobar
Player
Luke Bambridge
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jared Hiltzik
Player
Luke Bambridge
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
91)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luke Bambridge
Player
Justin Boulais
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marinko Matosevic
Player
Luke Bambridge
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
46%
(
39 of
84)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Dennis Nevolo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Dennis Nevolo
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Dunbar
Player
Dennis Nevolo
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
26 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dennis Nevolo
Player
Patrick Daciek
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Nevolo
Player
Guy Orly Iradukunda
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
49 of
83)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Trevor Allen Johnson
Player
Dennis Nevolo
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Smyczek
Player
Dennis Nevolo
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Nevolo
Player
Samuel Monette
65%
(
62 of
96)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
96
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Alexander Ward
Player
Dennis Nevolo
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
43%
(
20 of
46)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dennis Nevolo
Player
Alexei Popyrin
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
2
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
10
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
90%
(
28 of
31)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Dennis Nevolo
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
39%
(
38 of
98)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
98)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Bambridge Vs Nevolo Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Bambridge are available here and Nevolo photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
